^Nuclear option: Why Trump's Supreme Court pick needs only 51 votes. cbsnews. July 9, 2018 [December 27, 2018]. （原始内容于2018-12-09）.
^McConnell went 'nuclear' to confirm Gorsuch. But Democrats changed Senate filibuster rules first.. nbcnews. [December 27, 2018]. （原始内容于2018-12-12）.
^Republicans go 'nuclear,' bust through Democratic filibuster on Gorsuch. April 6, 2017 [December 27, 2018]. （原始内容于2018-08-04）.
^Senate approves 'nuclear option,' clears path for Neil Gorsuch Supreme Court nomination vote. Apr 6, 2017 [December 27, 2018]. （原始内容于2019-08-04）.
^Reynolds, Molly E. What is the Senate filibuster, and what would it take to eliminate it?. Brookings Institution. September 9, 2020 [September 23, 2020]. （原始内容于2021-01-06）.
外部链接
Supportive of nuclear option
M. Gold & D. Gupta, The Constitutional Option to Change Senate Rules and Procedures: a Majoritarian Means to Overcome the Filibuster in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy; 28 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 205 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） (2004) (arguing that the nuclear/constitutional option it is firmly grounded in Senate history) (PDF file)
William G. Dauster, “The Senate in Transition or How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Love the Nuclear Option,” （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） N.Y.U. Journal of Legislation & Public Policy, volume 19 (number 4) (December 2016): pages 631–83 (explaining Senator Reid's use of the nuclear option).
Washington Post article on Republican's 1968 Fortas filibuster （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）
Hatching a New Filibuster Precedent: The Senator from Utah's Revisionist history （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） John Dean writes for FindLaw arguing that Orrin Hatch has attempted to mischaracterize the Abe Fortas nomination filibuster.
David Law & Lawrence B. Solum, "Judicial Selection, Appointments Gridlock, and the Nuclear Option," (April 14, 2006).
History of U.S. House Committee on Rules （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）
[[[:Template:US Senate Rule URL]] Standing Rules of The Senate]
Politics and justice for all: Court nomination fights predate Bork, Thomas
一月 30, 2023
核选项, 在美国参议院, 英語, nuclear, option, 是一种议事程序, 允许参议院以简单多数推翻日常规则, 而不是参议院规则通常需要的三分之二的绝对多数, 特别是在60票规则中, 该程序被用来结束辩论并结束阻挠议事, 2013年11月, 哈里, 里德领导的参议院民主党多数通过该程序取消了除最高法院提名外的总统提名60票规则, 首次援引了, 2017年4月, 再次援引了, 这一次, 由米奇, 麦康奈尔领导的参议院共和党多数也取消了最高法院提名的60票规则, 从而结束了关于尼尔, 戈萨奇提名的辩论, 截至. 在美国参议院 核选项 英語 Nuclear option 是一种议事程序 允许参议院以简单多数推翻日常规则 而不是参议院规则通常需要的三分之二的绝对多数 特别是在60票规则中 该程序被用来结束辩论并结束阻挠议事 2013年11月 哈里 里德领导的参议院民主党多数通过该程序取消了除最高法院提名外的总统提名60票规则 首次援引了核选项 1 2017年4月 再次援引了核选项 这一次 由米奇 麦康奈尔领导的参议院共和党多数也取消了最高法院提名的60票规则 从而结束了关于尼尔 戈萨奇提名的辩论 2 3 4 截至2021年7月 核选项尚未被用于废除立法上的阻挠议事程序 5 废除阻挠议事程序需要至少51名参议员的投票 或者如果副总统 作为参议院主席 的反对票也投赞成票 则需要50名参议员的投票 核选项 一词类似于核武器是战争中最极端的选择 参考资料 编辑 Nuclear option Why Trump s Supreme Court pick needs only 51 votes cbsnews July 9 2018 December 27 2018 原始内容存档于2018 12 09 McConnell went nuclear to confirm Gorsuch But Democrats changed Senate filibuster rules first nbcnews December 27 2018 原始内容存档于2018 12 12 Republicans go nuclear bust through Democratic filibuster on Gorsuch April 6 2017 December 27 2018 原始内容存档于2018 08 04 Senate approves nuclear option clears path for Neil Gorsuch Supreme Court nomination vote Apr 6 2017 December 27 2018 原始内容存档于2019 08 04 Reynolds Molly E What is the Senate filibuster and what would it take to eliminate it Brookings Institution September 9 2020 September 23 2020 原始内容存档于2021 01 06 外部链接 编辑Supportive of nuclear optionM Gold amp D Gupta The Constitutional Option to Change Senate Rules and Procedures a Majoritarian Means to Overcome the Filibuster in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 28 Harvard Journal of Law amp Public Policy 205 页面存档备份 存于互联网档案馆 2004 arguing that the nuclear constitutional option it is firmly grounded in Senate history PDF file William G Dauster The Senate in Transition or How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Love the Nuclear Option 页面存档备份 存于互联网档案馆 N Y U Journal of Legislation amp Public Policy volume 19 number 4 December 2016 pages 631 83 explaining Senator Reid s use of the nuclear option Policy Analysis by Senate Republican Policy Committee summarizing arguments and reviewing history National Review s Bench Memos 页面存档备份 存于互联网档案馆 Senator George Allen R VA Calls Democrats Bluff 页面存档备份 存于互联网档案馆 Opposed to nuclear optionCenter for American Progress Nuclear Option Resource Guide 页面存档备份 存于互联网档案馆 CivilRights org a coalition representing 180 national organizations Home Page for Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid D Nev Independent Judiciary 页面存档备份 存于互联网档案馆 Senator Reid s Letter to Bill Frist Washington Post article on Republican s 1968 Fortas filibuster 页面存档备份 存于互联网档案馆 Hatching a New Filibuster Precedent The Senator from Utah s Revisionist history 页面存档备份 存于互联网档案馆 John Dean writes for FindLaw arguing that Orrin Hatch has attempted to mischaracterize the Abe Fortas nomination filibuster Revenge of the Frist MoveOn org Emergency Petition to Save the Courts Myth and fact sheets Filibustering the Truth 页面存档备份 存于互联网档案馆 OtherDavid Law amp Lawrence B Solum Judicial Selection Appointments Gridlock and the Nuclear Option April 14 2006 History of U S House Committee on Rules 页面存档备份 存于互联网档案馆 History of U S Senate Committee on Rules and Administration Template US Senate Rule URL Standing Rules of The Senate TIME The Filibuster Formula Politics and justice for all Court nomination fights predate Bork Thomas 取自 https zh wikipedia org w index php title 核选项 amp oldid 69830268, 维基百科，wiki，书籍，书籍，图书馆，
